What a KPV-Only Report Has to Separate from a Blend Report

Count the names before you trust the number

A blend report introduces itself by listing several components. Task 87708 does it in the sample name and again in the result table. A report for the KPV 10 mg single should be able to say KPV without needing the other three to make sense. If the other three are on the page, stop and switch folders.

This is the same habit as matching a task number to a vial. The extra names are the tell.

One result does not inherit the blend’s layout

You may want the single’s COA to show a milligram content, because the blend spoke in milligrams. The lab might print a percent, a mass, or both. Read what is there. A percent is a percent. Do not convert it to milligrams to make it resemble 11.75.

If the single’s file has no purity line, do not copy a purity from a different peptide that “usually has one.” Silence is data about the document. Fill it by getting the right document, not by borrowing.

Dates and batch strings

November 13, 2025, and batch 2025-11 belong to task 87708. They do not become the manufacturing story of every KPV vial. When the single’s report has a date, use that date. When the vial in your hand has a batch code, that code has to appear on the report before the report belongs to the vial.

A match on the letters KPV plus a mismatch on the batch is still a mismatch.

Cropping is how blends become singles

A square image of the 11.75 mg line, with the GHK-Cu line sliced off, will circulate. Treat a crop as incomplete. Open the COA page for the task and see the rest of the sheet. If the rest of the sheet is a blend, the crop was a blend.

We do not redraw these reports into a one-line card. The image is the record.

File naming

Name the file with the SKU and the task, once you have a task for that SKU. Do not name a KLOW download “KPV-10mg-final.” Adults 21 and older. Laboratory research only. Not for human or veterinary use.

A two-question gate

Before a PDF is allowed into the KPV 10 mg folder, answer two questions on paper. Does the sample name list GHK-Cu, BPC-157, or TB-500? If yes, it is KLOW or some other blend, and it goes elsewhere. Does the sample name identify KPV without those partners? If yes, it can stay, and you still have to match batch and date to the vial.

Failing the gate is not a close call. Task 87708 fails it on purpose. That failure is the training example. New files get the same two questions, even when the layout looks different.

Adults 21 and older. Laboratory research only. Not for human or veterinary use.

Run the two-question gate on old files, not only new ones. Search the KPV folder for GHK, BPC, and TB. Anything that hits moves to KLOW or to a quarantine folder named mixed. Do it once and the folder stays honest. Skip it and task 87708 will be duplicated under a friendly name by Friday.

Make the file names boring and specific. klow-task-87708.pdf stays named for the blend, including the date November 13, 2025, and batch 2025-11 if you put them in the filename. A future KPV single report gets kpv-10mg and its own task number, and not the digits 87708. If you cannot name the file without borrowing those digits, you do not have a single-vial report yet. Leave the KPV results folder empty. An empty folder with a clear name is a better record than a borrowed PDF that makes the drawer look finished.